As far as I can tell, this driver must have produced this error
for as long as it has been merged into the mainline kernel, but
it was never part of the normal build tests:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c: In function 'nuc900_i2c_probe':
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c:601:17: error: request for member 'apbfreq' in something not a structure or union
ret = (i2c->clk.apbfreq)/(pdata->bus_freq * 5) - 1;
^
This is an attempt to get the driver to build and possibly
work correctly, although I do wonder whether we should just
remove it, as it has clearly never worked.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c
index 36394d7..e3e9f95 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static int nuc900_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_get_rate(i2c->clk);
- ret = (i2c->clk.apbfreq)/(pdata->bus_freq * 5) - 1;
+ ret = clk_get_rate(i2c->clk)/(pdata->bus_freq * 5) - 1;
writel(ret & 0xffff, i2c->regs + DIVIDER);
/* find the IRQ for this unit (note, this relies on the init call to
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
