Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "WS" == Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
>>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
>>> module again to get it working.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@xxxxxxx>
> 
> WS> Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
> 
> Arguably yes.
> 

Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate
patch or should I change this one and resubmit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux