On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:09:12PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > > Wolfram wrote: > > > > > > IMHO it makes sense. Why wouldn't we want all platform_data in > > > > include/linux/platform_data/? > > > > > > For the same reason we don't want all driver source files in one > > > directory? It's a mess. > > > > Well, that's different. Not all drivers expose platform data, but > > many subsystems have drivers with platform data. A common include > > directory for the *_platform_data structure definitions makes sense. > > Also IMO having such header file in include/linux/i2c/ for a driver > declared in drivers/misc/eeprom/ is not very consistent. > So this is the purpose of this include directory. What do you think? Well, yes, I will apply it if you could rebase it onto v3.12-rc2. I am unsure about the platform_data dir in general, though. For example, I'd prefer to have the i2c-* files in the i2c-dir, but this is another question. Thanks, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
