On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:24:47PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> *_get typically also implies some reference counting which I don't >> believe this does. I don't think having 2 functions with completely >> different names doing the same thing with only a different calling >> convention is good either. So I would keep the old name and the names >> aligned. > > Okay, I'll make the new function __irq_of_parse_and_map(). I don't know why i detest __prefixing so much but I think it's really nasty. Usually this is reserved for compiler- and linker related things, like __packed; or __init. I would prefer irq_of_parse_and_map_strict() or something like that. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
