Re: [PATCH 2/9] irqdomain: Introduce __irq_create_mapping()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is a version of irq_create_mapping() that propagates the precise
> error code instead of returning 0 for all errors. It will be used in
> subsequent patches to allow further propagation of error codes.
>
> To avoid code duplication, implement irq_create_mapping() as a wrapper
> around the new __irq_create_mapping().
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>

Surprise! I don't like this.

I think it is better to first go over the call sites and make them
all handle negative return numbers rather than pushing the
obscure __interface.

I know from patch 0 that you think it's too much to change these
127 call sites but I don't think so, and I'm happy to merge one
big patch changing all the 20 users in drivers/gpio.

Likewise with the 11 consumers in drivers/pinctrl.

It's just a a few archs+subsystems and it's just plain work.

So do that first.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux