Re: [PATCH 4/5] i2c: sirfsoc: support reverse direction of address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/8/28 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> > Hmm, you are not advertising I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING so users should
>> > not use it.
>>
>> Wolfram, good comments. the old codes did miss
>> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING which i will fix in v2.
>>
>> > Does the master allow to implement the rest of mangling,
>> > too?
>> >
>>
>> i think only I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR. i didn't hear I2C_M_NOSTART,
>> I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK from hardware guys.
>
> Hmm, since the driver can't support all of MANGLING, it might be wise to
> not advertise it. I am undecided how to handle this generally. Until
> then, I'll accept this patch (and the series) as is.

ok, thanks Wolfram. then i will not have v2.
>

-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux