Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] i2c: mxs: Rework the PIO mode operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Torsten Fleischer,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +			/* Check NAK here ? */
> > > 
> > > checking for the NAK at this point is really necessary.
> > > 
> > > I've tested the patches by writing to the EEPROM using the at24 driver.
> > > If the data to write cross the EEPROM's page boundary then the at24
> > > driver splits the I2C write commands.
> > > 
> > > After the first I2C write command is done the at24 driver immediately
> > > tries
> > > to send the next I2C write command. Normally the EEPROM signals a NAK,
> > > because the previous write operation is internally still in progress.
> > > The NAK will be handled by the at24 driver. It later retries the I2C
> > > write command.
> > > 
> > > But if the the EEPROM signals a NAK and the I2C write command has more
> > > than
> > > 3 and less than 7 bytes then the error "PIO: Failed to finish WRITE
> > > cmd!" appears, because the loop is not exited due to the NAK.
> > 
> > Ok, so we check
> > 
> > HW_I2C_STAT :: GOT_A_NAK bit at the end of the loop and if it's set, we
> > "goto cleanup" with ret = -ENXIO . How does it sound to you?
> 
> this sounds good to me.

Does it fix your EEPROM issue then ?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux