> > >Would it make sense to add generic I2C device tree properties for those > > >parameters? These parameters are independent of the actual bus driver, > > >rather a PCB property... And as such the correct place would be device > > >tree or ACPI or similar. > > > > If there are other bus drivers that make use of tr/tf transition > > times, I think it makes sense. > > Wolfram, what's your opinion on this? If it is a PCB property, it makes sense to have generic bindings for it. Can they have very-safe defaults and thus be optional?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
