Dear Ben Hutchings, > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 00:09 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yes, the big question is if we want to use this patch or fix the PIO. I > > > think this one is much less intrusive, so I'd vouch for yours for 3.10 > > > . > > > > Correct. Also according to Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt : > > > > "Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into > > the "-stable" tree: > > > > .... > > > > - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context." > > > > Your PIO fix is really appreciated, but it surpasses 100 lines, so it > > would be better if we go with this one first so that it can reach > > 3.10, and then we can use your PIO fix later. > > That one is not a hard and fast rule, but small localised fixes are > preferred if possible. Full agreement on this one, let's apply this patch. Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
