On Friday 12 July 2013 12:00:47 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Briefly looking into ACPI tables we have and mechanisms that we can > > use in ACPI case, I doubt we may apply all the ideas, probably some of > > them, though I didn't get yet where to read about in details. What I > > could say now is that the patch provided by Bin Gao is definitely no > > go. > > Laurent explained to me what V4L did and now does. It used to be the way > tha V4L drivers did register I2C slaves according to platform_data. Now, > with DT the slaves get instanciated earlier, so they now use notifiers > to know when the slaves are in place. Something like this should > probably be done here, too, instead of unregistering and re-registering. This will be available in v3.11 in drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
