On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:18:17PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > >> I2C devices probed from device tree should subsequently be > >> fixed to handle the case where of_match_table() is > >> used (I think none of them do that today), and platforms should > >> fix their device trees to use compatible strings for I2C devices > >> instead of setting the name to Linux device driver names as is > >> done in multiple cases today. > > > > I guess your solution is the least intrusive one. Still, it could happen > > that of_match_table is scanned three times (by driver core, i2c layer, > > and i2c driver) which is IMO an indication to look for a more elegant > > solution tp find out what really matched? > > I think that is a generic problem with the device tree > being completely stateless, and rather a comment on the > of_match_device() intrinsics being inelegant than on this > patch? Yes. > Do you see it as a blocker for the patch? No blocker. Yet, I was hoping for somebody perhaps having a good idea. Platform devices have 'id_entry', for example. Sadly, I don't have the resources to pick up a similar idea.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature