Wolfram, On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Regarding patch 1, I was waiting for the idr changes to hit mainline. > They are mainline now, but since the removal of MAX_IDR_MASK your patch > doesn't apply anymore :( Can you rebase and retest, please? I'd like to > get it into 3.9, still. Yes, I'll rebase/retest tomorrow. I'll let you make the call between 3.9 and 3.10. Obviously I'd love to see it in 3.9 but I'm OK with either. I was just hoping not to find out at the end of the 3.10 cycle that it needs fixes and need to wait for 3.11. I wanted to make sure all my ducks were in a row. ;-) > For patch 2, some Tested-by would be nice; but it will probably make it > into my for-next somewhen after rc1 is out. I have no urgent need for patch 2 to land but it seemed nice to tidy up the pxa driver and I felt it was my obligation to post it together with patch set #1 (plus it's always nice to remove code). Putting it into your for-next seems like a very good solution. That gives people some time to test it and make sure it works for them. Thanks! -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
