Hi everyone,
On 07/09/2010 11:07 AM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Add multiplexed bus core support. I2C multiplexer and switches
like pca954x get instantiated as new adapters per port.
Signed-off-by: Michael Lawnick<demx1175@wbit01lx.(none)>
Cc: Jean Delvare<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I noticed that when you have multiple muxes connected to the same
branch, implementation hides some information about the complete i2c
topology.
So for instance if I have something like (notice there are three
PCA9544's "in parallel", each with its own address, which I assume is a
bit unusual):
# CPU (i2c-0)
# '--I2C Mux0 (PCA9547) @ 0x70
# +--Port0 (i2c-1)
# +--Port1 (i2c-2)
# +--Port2 (i2c-3)
# +--Port3 (i2c-4)
# +--Port4 (i2c-5)
# | '--- I2C Mux1 (PCA9544) @ 0x74
# | | +--Port0 (i2c-9)
# | | +--Port1 (i2c-10)
# | | +--Port2 (i2c-11)
# | | '--Port3 (i2c-12)
# | +--- I2C Mux2 (PCA9544) @ 0x71
# | | +--Port0 (i2c-13)
# | | +--Port1 (i2c-14)
# | | +--Port2 (i2c-15)
# | | '--Port3 (i2c-16)
# | '--- I2C Mux3 (PCA9544) @ 0x72
# | +--Port0 (i2c-17)
# | +--Port1 (i2c-18)
# | +--Port2 (i2c-19)
# | '--Port3 (i2c-20)
# +--Port5 (i2c-6)
# +--Port6 (i2c-7)
# '--Port7 (i2c-8)
under /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ I get:
0-0010 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0010
0-0011 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0011
0-0070 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070
5-0071 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/5-0071
5-0072 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/5-0072
5-0074 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/5-0074
|2c-0 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0
i2c-1 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-1
i2c-2 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-2
i2c-3 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-3
i2c-4 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-4
i2c-5 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5
i2c-6 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-6
i2c-7 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-7
i2c-8 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-8
i2c-9 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-9
i2c-10 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-10
i2c-11 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-11
i2c-12 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-12
i2c-13 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-13
i2c-14 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-14
i2c-15 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-15
i2c-16 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-16
i2c-17 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-17
i2c-18 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-18
i2c-19 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-19
i2c-20 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-20
So I have no way of telling that:
i2c-{9,10,11,12} are connected to mux1 at address 0x74 of i2c-5
i2c-{13,14,15,16} are connected to mux2 at address 0x71 of i2c-5
i2c-{17,18,19,20} are connected to mux3 at address 0x72 of i2c-5
because I get:
# cat /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-9/name
i2c-5-mux (chan_id 0)
# cat /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-13/name
i2c-5-mux (chan_id 0)
which only reveals i2c-9 is the bus segment connected to channel 0 of a
mux behind i2c-5, but since there's two of them, I have no way to tell
which one...
So I guess the easiest thing to do would be to add this information
within the .name attribute, though I fear this may somehow turn out not
as trivial at it looks.
What I'd like most though would be to get some hierarchy as follows:
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-9
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-10
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-11
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-12
or even something like:
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-0(=>...i2c-9)
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-1(=>...i2c-10)
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-2(=>...i2c-11)
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-3(=>...i2c-12)
Would the above seem reasonable?
Thanks!
Gerlando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html