From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000 > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000 >> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the >>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function >>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable >>>> for sparc. >>>> >>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the >>>> corresponding subsystem trees. >>> >>> They should go through the subsystem trees. >> >> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks. > > I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my > knickers in a knot if you insist. That's fine: Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
