Hi Wolfram, Shubhrajyoti, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Currently we just queue the transfer and release the >> > qos constraints, however we donot wait for the transfer >> > to complete to release the constraint. Move the remove >> > constraint after the bus busy as we are sure that the >> > transfers are completed by then. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> >> >> Good catch, the change definitely makes sense. Feel free to add: >> >> Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx> > > Since I just reverted the QoS patch, I suppose this gets merged into the > original patch when resent? The best for now is to re-submit a new patch that moves the constraint release in the original code. Later the PM QoS patch will be applied on the new code base. What do you think? I can provide a patch if needed. Regards, Jean > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
