On 11/5/12, Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/5/2012 3:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:53:45PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote: >>> On Monday 05 November 2012 07:44 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>>> - dev->syscstate); >>>>>> - } >>>> not sure if this will work. What about the first time you call reset() >>>> ? >>>> won't SYSC just contain the reset values ? >>> No actually the hwmod sets the value. >> >> ahaaa, ok good. Let's get an Ack from Benoit, then. > > Well, in fact, I'm a little bit surprised that we still have to hack the there was an attempt [1] the pdata stuff may have issues with dt having to deal with more pdata [2] > SYSC directly without using an omap_device API. Paul was not happy with omap device api [3] As far as the patch is concerned it is only getting rid of the hard coded flags and the rev check. > I know that we have to > do some weird stuff for reseting that IP, but didn't we already exposed > something to allow that? > > Regards, > Benoit [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg06810.html [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg06937.html [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg06943.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
