Hi, On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:39:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> The Armada-XP SoC has the same I2C controller as mv64xxxi-i2c. >> This validates to use mv64xxx in this SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig >> index 65dd599..ff53cf4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig >> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ config I2C_MPC >> >> config I2C_MV64XXX >> tristate "Marvell mv64xxx I2C Controller" >> - depends on (MV64X60 || PLAT_ORION) >> + depends on (MV64X60 || PLAT_ORION || MACH_ARMADA_370_XP) >> help >> If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the >> built-in I2C interface on the Marvell 64xxx line of host bridges. > > This is not needed: ARCH_MVEBU already selects PLAT_ORION. > Oh, I see. Thanks! Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html