Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 1:12 AM > To: Dmitry Torokhov > Cc: Jian-Jhong Ding; Scott Liu; linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jesse; Vincent Wang; Paul > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Support Elan Touchscreen eKTF product. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:47:42AM +0800, Jian-Jhong Ding wrote: > >> Scott Liu <scott.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > + > >> > +struct mt_device { > >> > + struct mt_slot curdata; /* placeholder of incoming data */ > >> > + __u8 num_received; /* how many contacts we received */ > >> > + __u8 num_expected; /* expected last contact index */ > >> > + __u8 maxcontacts; > >> > + bool curvalid; /* is the current contact valid? */ > >> > + struct mt_slot *slots; > >> > +}; > >> > >> With Benjamin's i2c-hid implimentation, is it possible to make > >> hid-multitouch not depend on USBHID and reuse it to drive this device? > > We can already use hid-multitouch with hid over I2C devices (I'm > testing my i2c devices with this module). > But it's true that hid-multitouch depends on usbhid, and I the funny > think is that I was removing this dependency today. > The fact is that currently, i2c devices do not segfault with > hid-multitouch because win8 devices do not require anymore to set > some feature at plug. > > > > > Exactly. Before looking any further - is this the same part that Tom Lin > > posted a driver for earlier this summer? > > I'm not Elan, and I can not be sure, but judging from the "hello > packets" and the other commands, I doubt this device is an I2C over > HID one. > It's an I2C device with ELAN own format, no HID packet transferring. > Anyway, reusing hid-multitouch for this specific case seams to be a > little bit difficult. You would have first to provide a fake report > descriptor (or inject commands as if you were hid-core) and then, you > would have to reformat the incoming data into valid win7 (or 8) > packets. Judging by the functions elan_touch_parse_fid, > elan_touch_parse_wid and elants_parse_xy, the data seem to be mixed > (all the finger ids at the beginning, and not one per touch), so it is > definitively needed to recreate a valid HID packet. > > So I'm not surprised with the duplicated code. However, Henrik did a > big job in kernel 3.7 to factorize mt code, and some part of the > duplication can be achieve with these functions (look at > input_mt_sync_frame and input_mt_get_slot_by_key for example). > I think so; it would cause too much pain for reuse hid-multitouch. BTW, I'll have checked Henrik's code to see if there are possible to reuse some code. Thanks, Scott > Cheers, > Benjamin > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
