On Wednesday 12 September 2012 03:21 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> -omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
>> > +omap_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> > {
>> > struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id;
>> > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> Shouldn't that be IRQ_NONE?
Actually we are processing it so I thought it to be ok.
Also a similar discussion.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-June/104422.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
