Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 2012/09/02 04:48:01:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
> <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > - mpc_i2c_stop(i2c);
> > + mpc_i2c_stop(i2c); /* Initiate STOP */
> > + orig_jiffies = jiffies;
> > + /* Wait until STOP is seen, allow up to 1 s */
> > + while (readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) & CSR_MBB) {
> > + if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + HZ)) {
> > + u8 status = readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "timeout\n");
> > + if ((status & (CSR_MCF | CSR_MBB | CSR_RXAK)) != 0) {
> > + writeb(status & ~CSR_MAL,
> > + i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR);
> > + mpc_i2c_fixup(i2c);
> > + }
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > + cond_resched();
> > + }
>
> Shouldn't the while-loop be inside mpc_i2c_stop() itself?
Possibly but I choosed to do it this way as there is a similar loop in the beginning of mpc_xfer().
I figured it has better visibility if it is in the same function.
Jocke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
