On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:38:29 +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote: > On 05.02.2012 11:38, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > Hi! > > > +Device-Tree bindings for i2c gpio driver > > + > > +Required properties: > > + - compatible = "gpio-i2c"; > > Driver name is "i2c-gpio" in file i2c-gpio.c. Previous version of patch > adding DT-support (prepared by Thomas Chou[1]) used i2c-gpio - could we > stick to that name? > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/23/584 Yes, please. The gpio subsystem normalized its driver names to gpio-*, so we shouldn't use that anywhere else to avoid confusion. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
