Hello, On 01/23/2012 09:56 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > add of support for the davinci i2c driver. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<hs@xxxxxxx> > Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Ben Dooks<ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Wolfram Sang<w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Grant Likely<grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sekhar Nori<nsekhar@xxxxxx> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk<wd@xxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/i2c.txt | 39 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/i2c.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/i2c.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/i2c.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..94ec670 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/i2c.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > +* Texas Instruments Davinci I2C > + > +This file provides information, what the device node for the > +davinci i2c interface contain. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "ti,davinci-i2c"; > +- reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device > +- id: id of the controller I was wondering whether we're supposed to use "cell-index" property name for such a device instance index? or doesn't it really matter and "id" is fine? Such an IP instance index seems quite common so I thought it could be easier to follow to use standard name. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
