On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:46:48 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > -module_init(gpiomux_init); > > > -module_exit(gpiomux_exit); > > > +module_platform_driver(gpiomux_driver); > > > > This one would be better as a separate patch, as it touches a different > > subdirectory, which I am responsible for. > > ... which has a patch pending[1], hint ;) > > [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/9432 Yes, that's one of the reasons why I think a separate patch would be more appropriate. It might be difficult to avoid patch collisions otherwise. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
