Hi Ben, On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:15 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > Ping. I don't see this in linux-next yet. > > > > Are you planning to queue this for v3.1? > > > > Oops, pushed send too soon on this... > > As this series touches various data files in arch/arm/mach-omap2/* and > we have a handful of other changes to that data for this merge window, I > think it would be better for conflict avoidance if this series is merged > via Tony's linux-omap tree. > > With your Ack, we'll merge it via OMAP. I see that the same day I sent this, you merged it into your next-i2c branch. Guess I was too late with my request. As I mentioned above, we will have several conflicts with the arch/arm/mach-omap2 changes in this series, so we would prefer to merge them via the OMAP tree if at all possible so we can properly handle the conflicts. Do you mind dropping it from your next-i2c so we can merge it via linux-omap (with your Ack.) Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
