On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:44:49 +0200 Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Seth, > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:33:39 -0700, Seth Heasley wrote: > > This patch adds the SMBus controller DeviceID for the Intel Panther Point PCH. > > With each new chip, we have to add the SMBus device ID to pci_ids.h, > then wait for Jesse to merge that, and only then I can apply the > changes to i2c-i801.c. This approach slows things down needlessly. > > It isn't mandatory to add IDs to pci_ids.h when an ID is only used > locally in a device driver. So what I would like to propose is that we > move all PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_*_SMBUS declarations from pci_ids.h to > i2c-i801.c now. Then you can resubmit your Panther Point patches, and > the pci and i2c parts will be independent, so Jesse and myself don't > depend on each other to apply them. > > What do you think? Jesse, any objection? > > Seth, if you agree, I can take care of the move, or you can send a > patch doing that, whatever you prefer. Yeah, that makes sense. I'd be happy to take a patch to pull the defines out of pci_ids.h and push them into the x86 irq.c and your i2c code. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
