Hi Jon, On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Jon Povey <Jon.Povey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ben Gardiner wrote: > >>>> When creating this series I noticed that there are obvious >>>> similarities between the existing recovery routine implemented by >>>> Philby John and John Povey > >> I'm not sure how the 20us in the existing method was derived -- I >> wonder if Philby John or John Povey could comment? > > I've been a little bemused about why I am getting credited for I2C > bus recovery work. I don't remember doing any work on that. My mistake -- sorry. Also sorry for getting your name wrong repeatedly. > I did a couple of patches to fix a race when setting up a TX, but > those are, afaik, unrelated. In "i2c-davinci: Fix race when setting up for TX" and "i2c-davinci: Fix TX setup for more SoCs" you mention testing on DM355 -- is there any you have hardware on which the recovery procedure is executed on occasion and that you would be available to test modifications to the current implementation? > All I know about the bus recovery stuff is looking at it a while back > and thinking hmm, that seems to wiggle gpio without changing the > pinmuxing, so it can't possibly work. :) Probably not then. Best Regards, Ben Gardiner --- Nanometrics Inc. http://www.nanometrics.ca -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
