On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
>> index d96db98..734d254 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>>
>> +struct mfd_cell;
>> +
>> struct platform_device {
>> const char * name;
>> int id;
>> @@ -23,6 +25,9 @@ struct platform_device {
>>
>> const struct platform_device_id *id_entry;
>>
>> + /* MFD cell pointer */
>> + struct mfd_cell *mfd_cell;
>> +
>
> Move this down to by the of_node pointer. May as well collect all the
> supplemental data about the device in the same place.
So, okay. wow. I have *no* idea what I was smoking at this point in
time. The of_node pointer is in struct device which is definitely not
the place to put the mfd_cell pointer (and you probably though I was
crazy when I suggested it). Greg was totally right to complain about
moving it into struct device. Sorry for causing trouble.
Move it back into struct platform_device and you should be good. I
just talked to greg, and there should be any issues with locating it
there.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
