On 2/9/2011 1:20 AM, Dirk Brandewie wrote: > On 02/05/2011 09:45 AM, Ben Dooks wrote: >>> @@ -347,15 +347,24 @@ config I2C_DAVINCI >>> devices such as DaVinci NIC. >>> For details please see http://www.ti.com/davinci >>> >>> -config I2C_DESIGNWARE >>> - tristate "Synopsys DesignWare" >>> +config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM >>> + tristate "Synopsys DesignWare Platfrom" >>> depends on HAVE_CLK >>> help >>> If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the >>> Synopsys DesignWare I2C adapter. Only master mode is supported. >>> >>> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module >>> - will be called i2c-designware. >>> + will be called i2c-designware-platform. >> >> not so happy about change in module name. That's what I thought first, but I was optimistic about this. > I am open to any name, the current names come from Shinya's feedback. > I will use what ever name everyone finds reasonable. Okay, we have two courses. 1. (re-)use current 'i2c-designware.ko' name for the platform driver (I mean i2c-designware-core.c + i2c-designware-plat) not to disturb existing users/systems, and give a new name for the PCI version (e.g. i2c-designware-pci). 2. Use the same name both for the platform and the PCI drivers, and make only one driver to be configured using Kconfig. Which one is a preferable course of action, Ben? -- Shinya Kuribayashi Renesas Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
