On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:11:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > 2010/9/15 Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:35:29AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > We really should have an i2c_initcall, but it may be difficult to move > > everyone over to it. What would be lovely is some form of dependency > > based initialisation, but that's probably a way off... > > SPI, SDIO and other external busses (Dallas 1-wire? w1) may all have > the same "needs to be up early because we need that before that" > type of problem. > > Makes me think of crazy things like putting a lightweight version of > Lennars Pötterings "systemd" scheme into the kernel for resolving > these initcalls. Either that, or build stuff as modules and use an initrd... Not sure what the best solution is... -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
