Hi Dmitry, On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:09:12 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Frankly I'd prefer taking input stuff through my tree with the goal of > .36 merge window just to minimize potential merge issues. This is a > simple cleanup patch that has no dependencies, so there is little gain > from doing it all in one go. If I take the patch in my i2c tree, the aim is to merge it upstream immediately, so merge issues won't exist. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html