Hello Wolfram:
First news about it.... Then lets wait to see how this goes, there
are not so many people using this hw.... IMHO If finaly we move from
of_platform to platform we would be doing a bad mistake, of_platform
is much more clean and useful
Best regards
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:45, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Of course we can have a more flexible patch, let me think about the
>>> best (clean) way to implement it.
>>
>> I did something similar to the xilinx_spi driver. It was OF only, I
>> splitted it into a generic part, and OF part, and write a platform driver
>> part.
>
> Wasn't Grant Likely about to post a patch-series getting rid of the of_platform
> bus for this merge window?
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvyU7wACgkQD27XaX1/VRswLACghJXHJmP8t93q6euaj4TH4mIl
> 7cUAnRcQIb1lqMyt5X8dalaD5mS787U0
> =c0Tj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
