Hi Wolfram, On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:55:32 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Commit 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe introduced this requirement. > > Reported-by: Albrecht Dreß <albrecht.dress@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Depends on: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5496 > > ([PATCH V2] at24: Fall back to byte or word reads if needed) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > index 88c20da..d2deea4 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > @@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) > at24->bin.attr.mode = chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_IRUGO ? S_IRUGO : S_IRUSR; > at24->bin.read = at24_bin_read; > at24->bin.size = chip.byte_len; > + sysfs_bin_attr_init(&at24->bin); I think it would make more sense to move the initialization _before_ manually setting other struct members. You don't know what sysfs_bin_attr_init does or will do in the future. > > at24->macc.read = at24_macc_read; > I presume the at25 driver needs the same fix? -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
