Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:55:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> "__devinit[data]" has not yet been used for all initialization functions
>> and data. To avoid truncating lines, the struct mpc_i2c_match_data has
>> been renamed to mpc_i2c_data, which is even the better name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c |   99 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
>> index f627001..2cb864e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct mpc_i2c_divider {
>>  	u16 fdr;	/* including dfsrr */
>>  };
>>  
>> -struct mpc_i2c_match_data {
>> +struct mpc_i2c_data {
>>  	void (*setclock)(struct device_node *node,
>>  			 struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>>  			 u32 clock, u32 prescaler);
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int i2c_wait(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, unsigned timeout, int writing)
>>  }
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx
>> -static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_52xx[] = {
>> +static const struct __devinitdata mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_52xx[] = {
>>  	{20, 0x20}, {22, 0x21}, {24, 0x22}, {26, 0x23},
>>  	{28, 0x24}, {30, 0x01}, {32, 0x25}, {34, 0x02},
>>  	{36, 0x26}, {40, 0x27}, {44, 0x04}, {48, 0x28},
>> @@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_52xx[] = {
>>  	{10240, 0x9d}, {12288, 0x9e}, {15360, 0x9f}
>>  };
>>  
>> -int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, int prescaler)
>> +static int __devinit mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock,
>> +					  int prescaler)
>>  {
>>  	const struct mpc_i2c_divider *div = NULL;
>>  	unsigned int pvr = mfspr(SPRN_PVR);
>> @@ -215,9 +216,9 @@ int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, int prescaler)
>>  	return div ? (int)div->fdr : -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
>> -				  struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> -				  u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
>> +					    struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> +					    u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>>  {
>>  	int ret, fdr;
>>  
>> @@ -230,15 +231,15 @@ static void mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
>>  		dev_info(i2c->dev, "clock %d Hz (fdr=%d)\n", clock, fdr);
>>  }
>>  #else /* !CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx */
>> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
>> -				  struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> -				  u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
>> +					    struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> +					    u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>>  {
>>  }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx*/
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_SOC
>> -static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx[] = {
>> +static const struct __devinitdata mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx[] = {
>>  	{160, 0x0120}, {192, 0x0121}, {224, 0x0122}, {256, 0x0123},
>>  	{288, 0x0100}, {320, 0x0101}, {352, 0x0601}, {384, 0x0102},
>>  	{416, 0x0602}, {448, 0x0126}, {480, 0x0103}, {512, 0x0127},
>> @@ -258,7 +259,7 @@ static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx[] = {
>>  	{49152, 0x011e}, {61440, 0x011f}
>>  };
>>  
>> -u32 mpc_i2c_get_sec_cfg_8xxx(void)
>> +static u32 __devinit mpc_i2c_get_sec_cfg_8xxx(void)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *node = NULL;
>>  	u32 __iomem *reg;
>> @@ -287,7 +288,8 @@ u32 mpc_i2c_get_sec_cfg_8xxx(void)
>>  	return val;
>>  }
>>  
>> -int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_8xxx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>> +static int __devinit mpc_i2c_get_fdr_8xxx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock,
>> +					  u32 prescaler)
>>  {
>>  	const struct mpc_i2c_divider *div = NULL;
>>  	u32 divider;
>> @@ -320,9 +322,9 @@ int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_8xxx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>>  	return div ? (int)div->fdr : -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
>> -				  struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> -				  u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
>> +					    struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> +					    u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>>  {
>>  	int ret, fdr;
>>  
>> @@ -338,9 +340,9 @@ static void mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
>>  }
>>  
>>  #else /* !CONFIG_FSL_SOC */
>> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
>> -				  struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> -				  u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
>> +					    struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
>> +					    u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
>>  {
>>  }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_FSL_SOC */
>> @@ -529,8 +531,8 @@ static int __devinit fsl_i2c_probe(struct of_device *op,
>>  			clock = *prop;
>>  
>>  		if (match->data) {
>> -			struct mpc_i2c_match_data *data =
>> -				(struct mpc_i2c_match_data *)match->data;
>> +			struct mpc_i2c_data *data =
>> +				(struct mpc_i2c_data *)match->data;
>>  			data->setclock(op->node, i2c, clock, data->prescaler);
>>  		} else {
>>  			/* Backwards compatibility */
>> @@ -582,44 +584,35 @@ static int __devexit fsl_i2c_remove(struct of_device *op)
>>  	return 0;
>>  };
>>  
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_52xx = {
>> +	.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_8313 = {
>> +	.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_8543 = {
>> +	.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> +	.prescaler = 2,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_8544 = {
>> +	.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> +	.prescaler = 3,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const struct of_device_id mpc_i2c_of_match[] = {
>> -	{.compatible = "mpc5200-i2c",
>> -	 .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -			.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> -		},
>> -	},
>> -	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c",
>> -	 .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -			.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> -		},
>> -	},
>> -	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c",
>> -	 .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -			.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> -		},
>> -	},
>> -	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-i2c",
>> -	 .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -			.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> -		},
>> -	},
>> -	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c",
>> -	 .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -			.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> -			.prescaler = 2,
>> -		},
>> -	},
>> -	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c",
>> -	 .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -			.setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> -			.prescaler = 3,
>> -		},
>> +	{.compatible = "mpc5200-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
>> +	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
>> +	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
>> +	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8313, },
>> +	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8543, },
>> +	{.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8544, },
>>  	/* Backward compatibility */
>> -	},
>>  	{.compatible = "fsl-i2c", },
>>  	{},
>>  };
> 
> Any particular reason you decided to move this all about?

This was necessary to allow using __devinit[data] for the clock setup
functions and clock diviver arrays above which results in some notable
saving of memory space if the driver is statically linked into the
kernel. If the data is defined within "mpc_i2c_of_match", section
mismatches are reported.

> Are you sure that __devinitdata is the right thing here, I've no idea
> if there is currently any hotplug type support for openfirmware or
> not.

I agree that __init[data] is more appropriate for this driver even if
many other non-hotplugable drivers use __devinit[data]. I will change that.

Wolfgang.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux