On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Hello, > > I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into > something like: > > I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core) > M: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > L: ... > W: ... > T: quilt ... > S: ... > F: Documentation/i2c/ > F: drivers/i2c/ > F: include/linux/i2c.h > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h > > I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms) > M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> > L: ... > W: ... > T: git ... > S: ... > F: drivers/i2c/ > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h > > (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.) I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output, won't it? This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do that or not. > > Best regards > Uwe > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 1858646..a1813fd 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> > L: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/ > T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/ > +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git > S: Maintained > F: Documentation/i2c/ > F: drivers/i2c/ Yes, please! Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html