On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:11:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:10:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 06:34:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > Maybe you can suggest a better place for it? > > > > drivers/mfd? > > > It's not a multifunction device. It's a microcontroller. > > Surely that's just an implementation detail? As I understand your > description the microcontroller is hiding the control interfaces of the > other things it controls so the function is pretty similar. No, it's a question of whether drivers/mfd is right. The "shovel everything that doesn't fit elsewhere into drivers/mfd" approach is just creating yet another problem, just like drivers/i2c/chips is percieved to be. The only difference is that it becomes someone elses problem. I've a good mind to put it in arch/arm/mach-pxa/ purely as a way of bringing this issue to a close - it's far from ideal having drivers outside of the drivers/ tree, but if that's the way it has to be to progress, so be it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
