On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Regarding the I2C-driver, I will try to clean up things as I see them. > > > Is there some reason why Jean or the I2C mailing list couldn't have been > > sent this driver instead of just Ben (or was it, and they didn't respond)? > > It was sent to the I2C list a couple of times (although sometimes Darius > made two posts, one to alkml and one to linux-i2c; probably a forgotten > CC, but it makes things a bit hard to track). It got quite some comments > there and the latest version, from what I can see, is here: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/2962 > > (which is _not_ the version Darius was posting in the last two days). > > As you can see, it was already reviewed and tested here at Pengutronix, > and it works for us with MX1/2/3. IMHO, it just needs one to pick it up, > preferably via an I2C-tree. Now, as Ben volunteered to be the > I2C-embedded-maintainer, we were all waiting for him to put it into his > tree (for 6 weeks now; we were nagging). As he really seems to have > disappeared I wonder if Jean can pick it up this time? If that is really the patch you want, i'll add it to my tree and push it. > Regards, > > Wolfram > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
