Re: Request for Clarification: old - legacy - new driver model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jean Delvare said the following:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:09:52 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> Therefore I asked for links in the OP so I can understand the idea of
>> the so called 'new I2C model'. The kernel documentation seems not to be
>> sufficient to achieve my goals.
>> Currently I'm waiting for 2 MUXes and an LM75, so I can connect them to
>> our current MUX-less board and start to play.
> 
> The documentation might not be perfect, right. It should become clearer
> once we get completely rid of the legacy model. Contributions to
> enhance the documentation are welcome, too.
> 
Just in short:
Don't feel criticized here. The documentation feels excellent for making
new devices. But what I'm searching for are 'inner' documents, which
AFAICS LINUX lacks almost completely.

Kind Regards,
Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux