Re: + i2c-fix-i2c-mpc-driver-for-multi-master-i2c-busses.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 03:58:47AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I must have missed that.  It's not correct, in any case.
> Messages can easily have been *partially* transmitted.
> 
> Loss of arbitration appears at the first transmitted bit
> where one master sends '0' and overrides another, which
> is sending '1' instead.  Ideally it's while addressing a
> device, but it could be after some data bytes have been
> sent ... and, depending on the slave, acted upon.  Even
> after one or more repeated starts.

the master then wins the conflict continues sending its message to the
slave. so the slave never recieves a partial message.

therefore the partially transmitted problem is none and retrying after
arbritration lost is always safe.

yours,
 - clifford

-- 
Relax, its only ONES and ZEROS!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux