Hi Mike, On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:56:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 29 January 2009 04:37:17 Jean Delvare wrote: > > And there are other options available, such as Gna! or BerliOS. Never > > used these myself though. > > > > [2] https://gna.org/ > > [3] http://developer.berlios.de/ > > > > As far as I am concerned, I can live with all options, but what I > > really want to know is: which option would potential future > > contributors prefer? Please speak up if you care! > > any reason for not looking at sf.net ? they provide svn and everything else > needed ... they dont provide git currently though so an easy upgrade path like > is available with berlios is out of the question. Sourceforge is fat and slow and their mailing lists are filled up with spam. I have had too much trouble with that site as a user in the past so I did not even consider it as an option as a developer. > a quick survey based on packages in gentoo shows sf.net is significantly more > popular atm than berlios and gna (combined even). I'm not surprised, Sourceforge is really big. Probably berlios is essentially popular in Germany and gna essentially popular in France. > but yes, i could live with any of those sites ... Thanks, -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
