On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:16:27AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 15 December 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > > I was thinking that -EINVAL is almost the least informative > > > > > diagnostic code possible, since so many places return it > > > > > that it's usually hard to find out *which* invalid parameter > > > > > triggered ... > > > > > > > > > > Is there a less-overloaded code you could return? > > > > > > > > -EINVAL sounds right to me, all that's really missing is dev_dbg() > > > > messages in the drivers to log what the exact problem was. > > Fair enough, though it just papers over how ambiguous -EINVAL is. Unforunately there's not a lot of choice in errno.h for other options. > > > It might be more acceptable to be dev_err(), that way it will get > > > printed no matter what debug options have been selected. If so, a > > > seperate patch is probably in order to make the change. > > > > As far as I can see, such errors would be caused by development-time > > mistakes, so dev_dbg() seems appropriate. dev_err() would make the > > binaries larger for all end-users. > > Right, dev_dbg() is the way to go. I'd ack a version of this patch > which pairs these -EINVAL changes with dev_dbg() messages to make > these problems less painful to track down. dev_err() is much abused. Ok, I'll try and sort that out for you as soon as possible. -- Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
