On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 05:43:19PM -0800, Roman Kisel wrote:
> The existing example lacks the GIC interrupt controller property
> making it not possible to boot on ARM64, and it lacks the DMA
GIC controller is not relevant to this binding.
> coherence property making the kernel do more work on maintaining
> CPU caches on ARM64 although the VMBus trancations are cache-coherent.
>
> Add the GIC node, specify DMA coherence, and define interrupt-parent
> and interrupts properties in the example to provide a complete reference
> for platforms utilizing GIC-based interrupts, and add the DMA coherence
> property to not do extra work on the architectures where DMA defaults to
> non cache-coherent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/bus/microsoft,vmbus.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
Last time I said: not tested by automation.
Now: I see automation build failures, although I do not see anything
incorrect in the code, so that's a bit surprising. Please confirm that
binding was tested on latest dtschema.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/microsoft,vmbus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/microsoft,vmbus.yaml
> index a8d40c766dcd..5ec69226ab85 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/microsoft,vmbus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/microsoft,vmbus.yaml
> @@ -44,11 +44,22 @@ examples:
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges;
>
> + gic: intc@fe200000 {
> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> + reg = <0x0 0xfe200000 0x0 0x10000>, /* GIC Dist */
> + <0x0 0xfe280000 0x0 0x200000>; /* GICR */
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + }
I fail to see how this is relevant here. This is example only of vmbus.
Look how other bindings are done. Drop the example.
> +
> vmbus@ff0000000 {
> compatible = "microsoft,vmbus";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges = <0x0f 0xf0000000 0x0f 0xf0000000 0x10000000>;
> + dma-coherent;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <1 2 1>;
Use proper defines for known constants.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
