On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 10:09:36AM -0800, Roman Kisel wrote:
> [v5]
> - In the first patch, removed some arch-specific #ifdef guards to fix the
> arm64 build and stick to the direction chosen for the Hyper-V header files.
> I could not remove all of them as some interrupt state structures
> are defined differently for x64 and arm64 and are found in the same
> enclosing `union hv_register_value`.
>
> No changes to other patches (approved in v4).
From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
Don't get discouraged - or impatient
------------------------------------
After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are
busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should
receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of
one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
busy times like merge windows.
T Dec 18 Roman Kisel ( :8.6K|) [PATCH 0/2] hyperv: Fixes for get_vtl(void)
T Dec 26 Roman Kisel ( :8.1K|) [PATCH v2 0/3] hyperv: Fixes for get_vtl(void)
T Dec 26 Roman Kisel ( :8.6K|) [PATCH v3 0/5] hyperv: Fixes for get_vtl(), hv_vtl_apicid_to_vp_id()
T Dec 27 Roman Kisel ( :8.8K|) [PATCH v4 0/5] hyperv: Fixes for get_vtl(), hv_vtl_apicid_to_vp_id()
T Dec 30 Roman Kisel ( : 84|) [PATCH v5 0/5] hyperv: Fixes for get_vtl(), hv_vtl_apicid_to_vp_id()
This patchset gets sent almost every day. How about you slow-down and read the
docs while waiting?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
