On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 04:10:24PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 11:48:51PM +0000, Joe Damato wrote:
> > Use netif_queue_set_napi to link queues to NAPI instances so that they
> > can be queried with netlink.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/hyperv/rndis_filter.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> > index 2b6ec979a62f..ccaa4690dba0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> > @@ -712,8 +712,11 @@ void netvsc_device_remove(struct hv_device *device)
> > for (i = 0; i < net_device->num_chn; i++) {
> > /* See also vmbus_reset_channel_cb(). */
> > /* only disable enabled NAPI channel */
> > - if (i < ndev->real_num_rx_queues)
> > + if (i < ndev->real_num_rx_queues) {
> > + netif_queue_set_napi(ndev, i, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, NULL);
> > + netif_queue_set_napi(ndev, i, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, NULL);
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> When you post a non-RFC version of this patch, could you consider
> line-wrapping the above to 80 columns, as is still preferred for
> Networking code?
>
> There is an option to checkpatch that will warn you about this.
Thanks for letting me know.
I run checkpatch.pl --strict and usually it seems to let me know if
I am over 80, but maybe there's another option I need?
