On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:59:04PM -0700, Roman Kisel wrote:
> The arm64 Hyper-V startup path relies on ACPI to detect
> running under a Hyper-V compatible hypervisor. That
> doesn't work on non-ACPI systems.
>
> Hoist the ACPI detection logic into a separate function,
> use the new SMC added recently to Hyper-V to use in the
> non-ACPI case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
> index b1a4de4eee29..341f98312667 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,34 @@ int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool hyperv_detect_via_acpi(void)
> +{
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return false;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> + /* Hypervisor ID is only available in ACPI v6+. */
> + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 6)
> + return false;
> + return strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8) == 0;
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static bool hyperv_detect_via_smc(void)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res = {};
> +
> + if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC)
> + return false;
> + arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_0 &&
> + res.a1 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_1 &&
> + res.a2 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_2 &&
> + res.a3 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_3;
> +}
As you mentioned in the cover letter this is supported in latest Hyper-V hypervisor,
can we add a comment about it, specifying the exact version in it would be great.
If someone attempts to build non-ACPI kernel on older Hyper-V what is the
behaviour of this function, do we need to safeguard or handle that case ?
- Saurabh
