From: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 3:59 PM > > The arm64 Hyper-V startup path relies on ACPI to detect > running under a Hyper-V compatible hypervisor. That > doesn't work on non-ACPI systems. > > Hoist the ACPI detection logic into a separate function, > use the new SMC added recently to Hyper-V to use in the > non-ACPI case. Wording seems slightly messed up. Perhaps: Hoist the ACPI detection logic into a separate function. Then use the new SMC added recently to Hyper-V in the non-ACPI case. Also, the phrase "the new SMC" seems a bit off to me. The "Terms and Abbreviations" section of the SMCCC specification defines "SMC" as an instruction: Secure Monitor Call. An Arm assembler instruction that causes an exception that is taken synchronously into EL3. More precisely, I think you mean a SMC "function identifier" that is newly implemented by Hyper-V. And the function identifier itself isn't new; it's the Hyper-V implementation that's new. Similar comment applies in the cover letter for this patch set, and perhaps to the Subject line of this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c > index b1a4de4eee29..341f98312667 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c > @@ -27,6 +27,34 @@ int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info) > return 0; > } > > +static bool hyperv_detect_via_acpi(void) > +{ > + if (acpi_disabled) > + return false; > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) > + /* Hypervisor ID is only available in ACPI v6+. */ > + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 6) > + return false; > + return strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8) == 0; > +#else > + return false; > +#endif > +} > + > +static bool hyperv_detect_via_smc(void) > +{ > + struct arm_smccc_res res = {}; > + > + if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC) > + return false; > + arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res); > + > + return res.a0 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_0 && > + res.a1 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_1 && > + res.a2 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_2 && > + res.a3 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_3; > +} > + > static int __init hyperv_init(void) > { > struct hv_get_vp_registers_output result; > @@ -35,13 +63,11 @@ static int __init hyperv_init(void) > > /* > * Allow for a kernel built with CONFIG_HYPERV to be running in > - * a non-Hyper-V environment, including on DT instead of ACPI. > + * a non-Hyper-V environment. > + * > * In such cases, do nothing and return success. > */ > - if (acpi_disabled) > - return 0; > - > - if (strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8)) > + if (!hyperv_detect_via_acpi() && !hyperv_detect_via_smc()) > return 0; > > /* Setup the guest ID */ > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h > index a975e1a689dd..a7a3586f7cb1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h > @@ -51,4 +51,9 @@ static inline u64 hv_get_msr(unsigned int reg) > > #include <asm-generic/mshyperv.h> > > +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_0 0x7948734d > +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_1 0x56726570 > +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_2 0 > +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_3 0 > + Section 6.2 of the SMCCC specification says that the "Call UID Query" returns a UUID. The above #defines look like an ASCII string is being returned. Arguably the ASCII string can be treated as a set of 128 bits just like a UUID, but it doesn't meet the spirit of the spec. Can Hyper-V be changed to return a real UUID? While the distinction probably won't make a material difference here, we've had problems in the past with Hyper-V doing slightly weird things that later caused unexpected trouble. Please just get it right. :-) Michael > #endif > -- > 2.34.1 >