On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 01:24:21AM -0800, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote: > > > +#define HV_RING_SIZE (4 * 4096) > > > > Hey, that doesn't match the kernel driver! Why these values? > > This application talks to device which is recognize as HV_FCOPY > is kernel. In the first patch of current patch series I have > mentioned .pref_ring_size = 0x4000 for HV_FCOPY which matches this. > > This code is well tested. I'm commenting on the fact the 4096 is sometimes PAGE_SIZE and sometimes not, and you have a default of using PAGE_SIZE values in the kernel driver, and as such, this will not match up. So be careful here. > > > + > > > +unsigned char desc[HV_RING_SIZE]; > > > + > > > +static int target_fd; > > > +static char target_fname[PATH_MAX]; > > > +static unsigned long long filesize; > > > + > > > +static int hv_fcopy_create_file(char *file_name, char *path_name, __u32 flags) > > > +{ > > > + int error = HV_E_FAIL; > > > + char *q, *p; > > > + > > > + filesize = 0; > > > + p = (char *)path_name; > > > > Why the unneeded cast? > > This code is existing today as form of hv_fcopy_daemon. As this new > application is replacing hv_fcopy_daemon I reused the same code and > casting. That wasn't obvious that this was copied code, please be explicit about that. thanks, greg k-h