Re: [RFC 16/33] KVM: x86/mmu: Expose R/W/X flags during memory fault exits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 11:17 +0000, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Include the fault's read, write and execute status when exiting to
> > user-space.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c   | 4 ++--
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 9 +++++++--
> >  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 6 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index 4e02d506cc25..feca077c0210 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -4300,8 +4300,8 @@ static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
> >  static void kvm_mmu_prepare_memory_fault_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  					      struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> >  {
> > -	kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > -				      PAGE_SIZE, fault->write, fault->exec,
> > +	kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE,
> > +				      fault->write, fault->exec, fault->user,
> >  				      fault->is_private);
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 71e1e8cf8936..631fd532c97a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -2367,14 +2367,19 @@ static inline void kvm_account_pgtable_pages(void *virt, int nr)
> >  static inline void kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  						 gpa_t gpa, gpa_t size,
> >  						 bool is_write, bool is_exec,
> > -						 bool is_private)
> > +						 bool is_read, bool is_private)
> 
> It almost feels like there is a need for a struct to hold all of those parameters.

The most obvious solution would be to make "struct kvm_page_fault" common, e.g.
ARM's user_mem_abort() fills RWX booleans just like x86 fills kvm_page_fault.
But I think it's best to wait to do something like that until after Anish's series
lands[*].  That way the conversion can be more of a pure refactoring.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231109210325.3806151-1-amoorthy@xxxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux