On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:31 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 4:52 AM Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:58:29PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:19 PM Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 8:59 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > Use atomic_try_cmpxchg() instead of atomic_cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old
> > > > > in hv_nmi_unknown(). On x86 the CMPXCHG instruction returns success in
> > > > > the ZF flag, so this change saves a compare after CMPXCHG. The generated
> > > > > asm code improves from:
> > > > >
> > > > > 3e: 65 8b 15 00 00 00 00 mov %gs:0x0(%rip),%edx
> > > > > 45: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
> > > > > 4a: f0 0f b1 15 00 00 00 lock cmpxchg %edx,0x0(%rip)
> > > > > 51: 00
> > > > > 52: 83 f8 ff cmp $0xffffffff,%eax
> > > > > 55: 0f 95 c0 setne %al
> > > > >
> > > > > to:
> > > > >
> > > > > 3e: 65 8b 15 00 00 00 00 mov %gs:0x0(%rip),%edx
> > > > > 45: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
> > > > > 4a: f0 0f b1 15 00 00 00 lock cmpxchg %edx,0x0(%rip)
> > > > > 51: 00
> > > > > 52: 0f 95 c0 setne %al
> > > > >
> > > > > No functional change intended.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c index e6bba12c759c..01fa06dd06b6
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > @@ -262,11 +262,14 @@ static uint32_t __init ms_hyperv_platform(void)
> > > > > static int hv_nmi_unknown(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs) {
> > > > > static atomic_t nmi_cpu = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
> > > > > + unsigned int old_cpu, this_cpu;
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!unknown_nmi_panic)
> > > > > return NMI_DONE;
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (atomic_cmpxchg(&nmi_cpu, -1, raw_smp_processor_id()) != -1)
> > > > > + old_cpu = -1;
> > > > > + this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > > > > + if (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&nmi_cpu, &old_cpu, this_cpu))
> > > > > return NMI_HANDLED;
> > > > >
> > > > > return NMI_DONE;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.41.0
> > > >
> > > > The change looks correct to me. But is there any motivation other
> > > > than saving 3 bytes of generated code? This is not a performance
> > > > sensitive path. And the change adds 3 lines of source code. So
> > > > I wonder if the change is worth the churn.
> > >
> > > Yes, I was trying to make the function more easy to understand and
> > > similar to nmi_panic() from kernel/panic.c. I had also the idea of
> > > using CPU_INVALID #define instead of -1, but IMO, the above works as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > > In any case,
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Applied to hyperv-fixes.
> >
> > Uros, just so you know, DKIM verification failed when I used b4 to apply
> > this patch. You may want to check your email setup.
>
> Strange, because I didn't touch the mailer and git config for
> months... and recently I have sent many patches this way without
> problems.
This one [1] checks OK, so it looks like some transient issue with gmail.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231120153419.3045-1-ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx/
Thanks,
Uros.
