> > > +static __always_inline void __wrmsrns(u32 msr, u32 low, u32 high) > > > > Shouldn't this be named wrmsrns_safe since it has exception handling, similar > to > > the current wrmsrl_safe. > > > > Both safe and unsafe versions have exception handling, while the safe > version returns an integer to its caller to indicate an exception did > happen or not. I notice there are several call sites using the safe version w/o checking the return value, should the unsafe version be a better choice in such cases?
