Missed it in my review, but the kernel bot already noticed it, so....
On 20.09.23 06:52, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> [...]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> index 033b53f993c6..83019c3aaae9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> @@ -340,8 +340,10 @@ static inline u64 hv_get_non_nested_register(unsigned int reg) { return 0; }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_VTL_MODE
> void __init hv_vtl_init_platform(void);
> +int __init hv_vtl_early_init(void);
> #else
> static inline void __init hv_vtl_init_platform(void) {}
> +static int __init hv_vtl_early_init(void) {}
static inline
> #endif
>
> #include <asm-generic/mshyperv.h>
Thanks,
Mathias
